\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{
   colorlinks=true,
   linkcolor=cyan,
   filecolor=green,
   urlcolor=blue
}
\newcommand{\stitle}{Short title}
%% You can add user-defined commands below (a few examples are already included):
\newcommand{\Lsun}{$L_{\odot}$}
\newcommand{\Msun}{$M_{\odot}$}
\newcommand{\Rsun}{$R_{\odot}$}

\makeatletter
\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
                                   {-3.5ex \@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
                                   {2.3ex \@plus.2ex}%
                                   {\normalfont\large\bfseries}}
\makeatother
%%%

%% Margin Setup 
%% set 1-inch margins 
\addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.5in}
\addtolength{\evensidemargin}{-0.5in}
\addtolength{\textwidth}{1.0in}
\addtolength{\topmargin}{-0.75in}
\addtolength{\textheight}{1.4in}
\setlength{\footskip}{20pt}

\begin{document}

\begin{center}
\fontsize{14}{15}{\bf{Template for NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope's \\
Team Expertise Document}} \\
\footnotesize{{\it [The first page of this template contains general information and 
instructions; please remove it before submitting your proposal.]}}
\end{center}

\noindent
The NASA Roman proposal review uses a Dual Anonymous Proposal Review (DAPR) process. We have prepared
\href{https://collaboration.ipac.caltech.edu/spaces/RDOXDEV/pages/161617283/Dual+Anonymous+Peer+Review}{Guidelines for Proposers}  
to assist with the preparation of your proposal in order to comply with DAPR. This template is for the Team 
Expertise document that must accompany each Cycle 1 proposal. It includes the non-anonymized
information for your proposal. {\bf Use of this template is required.} \\

\noindent 
This section should provide a description of the expertise, background, and roles of key team members, as they
relate to the science proposed. This section should be limited in length to two pages; for most proposals, two or
three paragraphs will suffice. For proposals with a large number of Co-Investigators, it is not necessary to report
on the qualifications of every team member, nor is it necessary to provide a bio of all the team members---just the
top contributors to the analysis of the program will suffice. If proposers wish, they can identify the PI in this
section. \\

\noindent The proposers should follow the same formatting guidelines as the Scientific Justification PDF document, 
specifically, adopt a font size no smaller than 12pt, and have one inch margins on all sides as printed on a
8.5 x 11-inch paper.\\

\newpage

\section{Team Expertise (up to 2 pages)}

\section{References}

\end{document}
